That autobalance, though.

What's the deal with autobalance making full teams of bots v. full teams of players? Or randomly putting one player on a team full of bots against a team of players? I was on Lazytown earlier and got autobalanced to team of bots versus a team of players, so I went to Mario Kart v2 and got autobalanced -from- a team of bots to a team of players. It just strikes me that's not very balanced, kekeke.

 

I know that feeling, its just that not many people are on the server and its just empty sometimes.

 

I can see why autobalance would be needed, I just don't see why it wouldn't be balanced. Functions more like a random team switcher.

 

It's very random and it's something that is out of our control. I've seen it autobalance to where it stacked a ton of snipers on one team vs a full team of scouts which was funny. Wish we could control it, but sadly I don't believe we can really do anything about that. The only thing would be to remove the bots, but we can't really do that either.

 

Some servers auto-balance based on dominations per player/team but I'm not sure how that works out. At the end of the day auto-balance is still a pain

 

Auto-Balance temporarily removal vote maybe?

 

Not necessary. I think adding this as an option would cause more trouble than not.

 

I agree with Gavlan. I can see how it would cause tons of issue. I wasn't trying to say it should be gone. I see why it's necessary. Just a big pain sometimes. =D

 

yes but without it there would be chaos

 

i think that its a good idea (if its possible) to code the auto-balnce to change players with highscore or dominations ("good players" ik this doesnt mean its a good player but you know what i mean) and yeah one more question de auto balance inmunnity for the senior members.......yeah